![]() At the end of the day - without wanting to spoil the mystery for anyone - this is a game of calculations and winning is about stacking the factors that go into the match equation in your favour. ![]() This one ties in to watching the full highlights for a little while drill right down to the basics and ask yourself the questions that go without saying. But if you're using a 4-1-4-1 like Bayern Munich with everyone but the striker starting quite deep, control or attacking could ensure the front man gets enough support. If you're using a 4-2-3-1 like Arsenal's on attacking, the band of three attacking midfielders behind the striker will play very high and could leave the two central midfielders exposed. It's also important to think about the team mentality in relation to the formation. If standard is resulting in your players not closing down quickly enough or taking enough risks on the ball, use shouts such as 'pass into space' to rectify. Instead, it may be better to try standard, which will get your creative players on the ball deeper (and therefore in more space), see them play more patiently and drop the defensive line, forcing the opposition to either let you have the ball under no pressure or come out of their shell. It also uses a very high defensive line, which can compress the open space on the pitch. That will create a very direct approach and can result in you throwing men forward and firing balls straight into their defensive bunker. These were meant to simplify FM and make it more realistic - real managers talk to players, after all, rather than adjusting their sliders - but they're not as straightforward as they look.ĭon't assume that a home game for Chelsea against Hull City requires an attacking mentality. That's just one example, but the point is to think about how the different parts interact.ĭefensive, counter, standard, control, attacking. They could then feed wing-backs or attack-minded full-backs to ensure you're supplying the striker with the kind of service he's suited to. If you have a decent deep-lying midfielder or ball-playing centre-back, you could transition quickly by hitting the target man early and having him hold the ball up and bring the midfielders into play in the opposition half. That's just not compatible and eventually you're going to have to change the personnel, but in the meantime you need to find a compromise. ![]() Let's say he's blown the budget on an excellent target man, but the midfield is largely made up of intricate, technical types more suited to feeding quick, nimble strikers with through balls and there are no natural wingers to provide crosses. The problem people have here is they are often burdened by the terrible team-building of their predecessor. It's easy to just pick your best XI, choose a formation that fits your players' 'natural' preferences and assign the roles they're most suited to, but you need to think more deeply about the relationships between each member of the team.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |